Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Báo cáo toán học: "A new class of q-Fibonacci polynomials"

Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu khoa học ngành toán học tạp chí toán học quốc tế đề tài: A new class of q-Fibonacci polynomials | A new class of q-Fibonacci polynomials Johann Cigler Institut fur Mathematik Universitat Wien A - 1090 Wien Osterreich Johann.Cigler@univie.ac.at Submitted Mar 24 2003 Accepted May 2 2003 Published May 7 2003 MR Subject Classifications primary 05A30 05A15 secondary 15A15 Abstract We introduce a new ợ-analogue of the Fibonacci polynomials and derive some of its properties. Extra attention is paid to a special case which has some interesting connections with Euler s pentagonal number theorem. 1 Introduction The Fibonacci polynomials fn x s are defined by the recursion fn x s xfn-1 x s sfn-2 x s with initial values f0 x s 0 f1 x s 1. They are given by the explicit yf1 formula fn x s p n k xn 1 2ksk. L. Carlitz 3 has defined a q-analogue which k 0 has been extensively studied cf. e.g. 6 2 8 . 2-ij In 7 I found that Fn x s P n k 1 q 2 xn1 - 2ksk is another natural q-k 0 analogue which satisfies the simple but rather unusual recursion 2.8 . This recursion does not lend itself to the computation of special values. Therefore I was surprised as I Lyf J zfcA learned that it has been shown in 9 and 13 that Fn 1 1 p 1 kq 2 n k has Q k 0 the simple evaluation 3.2 . This fact led me to a thorough study of this q-analogue via a combinatorial approach based on Morse code sequences. We show that these q-Fibonacci polynomials satisfy some other recurrences too generalize some well-known facts for ordinary Fibonacci polynomials to this case derive their generating function and study the special values Fn 1 q and Fn 1 1 which turn out to be intimately connected with Euler s pentagonal number series. Finally we show that the Hankel determinants det .Fi j k 1 1 b can be explicitly evaluated. q i j 0 THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS 10 2003 R19 1 I want to thank H. Prodinger for pointing out to me identity 4.7 in 1 and the paper 4 S.O. Warnaar for some helpful remarks and drawing my attention to 9 and R. Chapman and C. Krattenthaler for providing another simple proof of 3.2 . .