Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
The grammar book teacher course part 83
Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tham khảo tài liệu 'the grammar book teacher course part 83', ngoại ngữ, ngữ pháp tiếng anh phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Chapter 28 Introduction to Relative Clauses 577 without affecting the grammaticality of the sentence. To capture this fact we can have an optional relative pronoun deletion rule operate after relative pronoun fronting. relative pronoun fronting I -past I sg read the book that you -past 2 sg mention relative pronoun deletion I -past 1 sg read the book you -past 2 sg mention After the morphological rules apply we get I read the book you mentioned. If we had had the relative pronoun deletion rule apply to the other sentence with a relativized object that we discussed above we would have produced The man you met is my teacher. Relative pronoun deletion applies only to relativized objects it does not apply to embedded sentences with relativized subjects The girl speaks Basque is my cousin. 1 know the girl speaks Basque. The Order of Difficulty of Relative Clauses So far we have examined four basic types of relative clauses SS Subject of the embedded sentence is identical to the subject of the main clause for example The girl who speaks Basque is my cousin. OS Subject of the embedded sentence is identical to the object of the main clause for example I know the girl who speaks Basque. SO Object of the embedded sentence is identical to the subject of the main clause for example The man who m you met is my teacher. OO Object of the embedded sentence is identical to the object of the main clause for example I read the book that you mentioned. In 1974 Kuno hypothesized that OS and OO relative clause types would be easier to acquire than SS and SO types. He reasoned that when the embedded relative clauses interrupted the sentence by coming directly after the subject of the main clause 2 they would be more difficult to process than those relative clauses that modified the object of the main sentence and thus came at the end of the sentence. Studies in the field of second language acquisition by loup and Kruse 1977 and Schumann 1978 seem to support Kuno s hypothesis. Schumann .