Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Lecture Criminal investigation - Chapter 4: Interviewing and interrogation

Chapter 4 - Interviewing and interrogation. After studying this chapter you will be able to: Understand the differences and similarities between interviews and interrogation, outline the steps in preparing for an interview and an interrogation, assess the challenges in relying on eyewitness identification, identify interviewing processes and techniques,. | FOUR Interviewing and Interrogation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Understand the differences and similarities between interviews and interrogation Outline the steps in preparing for an interview and an interrogation Assess the challenges in relying on eyewitness identification Explain the role of hypnosis in criminal investigation Describe Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) Identify interviewing processes and techniques Explain the impact of Miranda v. Arizona and other landmark Supreme Court cases on police interrogation Identify interrogation processes and techniques Understand the methods and importance of documenting an interview and interrogation Explain the importance of listening in an interview and interrogation 4-1 OBJECTIVES OF THE INTERROGATION PROCESS Successful interrogation accomplishes four objectives: Obtaining facts Eliminating the innocent Identifying the guilty Obtaining a confession 4-2 SIMILARITIES BETWEEN INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS Interviews Planning important Controlling surroundings important Privacy or semi privacy desirable Interrogations Planning critical Controlling surroundings critical Absolute privacy essential 4-3(a) SIMILARITIES BETWEEN INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS (cont'd) Interviews Establishing rapport important Careful listening Proper documentation Interrogations Establishing rapport important Careful listening Proper documentation 4-3(b) DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS Interviews Purpose is to obtain information Minimal or no preinterview legal requirements; no rights warning Cooperative relationship between interviewer and subject likely Interrogations Purpose to test information already obtained Extensive preinterrogation legal requirements; rights warning required Adversarial or hostile relationship between interviewer and subject likely 4-4(a) DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS (cont'd) Interviews No guilt or guilt uncertain Moderate planning or preparation Private or semiprivate environment . | FOUR Interviewing and Interrogation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Understand the differences and similarities between interviews and interrogation Outline the steps in preparing for an interview and an interrogation Assess the challenges in relying on eyewitness identification Explain the role of hypnosis in criminal investigation Describe Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) Identify interviewing processes and techniques Explain the impact of Miranda v. Arizona and other landmark Supreme Court cases on police interrogation Identify interrogation processes and techniques Understand the methods and importance of documenting an interview and interrogation Explain the importance of listening in an interview and interrogation 4-1 OBJECTIVES OF THE INTERROGATION PROCESS Successful interrogation accomplishes four objectives: Obtaining facts Eliminating the innocent Identifying the guilty Obtaining a confession 4-2 SIMILARITIES BETWEEN INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS Interviews Planning important .