Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery (Review)

Bamboo contains other organic composition in addition to cellulose and lignin. It contains about 2-6% starch, 2% deoxidized saccharide, 2-4% fat, and 0.8-6% protein. The carbohydrate content of bamboo plays an important role in its durability and service life. Durability of bamboo against mold, fungal and borers attack is strongly associated with its chemical composition. Bamboo is known to be susceptible to fungal and insect attack. The natural durability of bamboo varies between 1 and 36 months depending on the species and climatic condition [Liese 1980]. The presence of large amounts of starch. | Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery Review Guenaga KKFG Atallah ÁN Castro AA Matos D Wille-Jorgensen P THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION This is a reprint of a Cochrane review prepared and maintained byThe Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library 2008 Issue 4 http www.thecochranelibrary.com WILEY y Publishers Since 1807 Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery Review Copyright 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley Sons Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER . 1 ABSTRACT. 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY. 3 BACKGROUND. 3 OBJECTIVES . 3 METHODS. 3 RESULTS. 5 DISCUSSION. 8 AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS . 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 9 REFERENCES. 9 CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES. 11 DATA AND ANALYSES. 19 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 1 Anastomosis leakage 20 stratified for colonic or rectal surgery. Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 2 Overall anastomotic 22 leakage for colorectal surgery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 3 Mortality. . . . . 23 Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 4 Peritonitis. 23 Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 5 Reoperation. . . . 24 Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 6 Wound infection. . 24 Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 7 Infectious extra- 25 abdominal complications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 8 Non-infectious extra- 26 abdominal complications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation Outcome 9 Surgical site infections. 26