Kinh doanh - Marketing
Kinh tế quản lý
Biểu mẫu - Văn bản
Tài chính - Ngân hàng
Công nghệ thông tin
Tiếng anh ngoại ngữ
Kĩ thuật công nghệ
Khoa học tự nhiên
Khoa học xã hội
Văn hóa nghệ thuật
Sức khỏe - Y tế
Văn bản luật
Nông Lâm Ngư
Kỹ năng mềm
Luận văn - Báo cáo
Giải trí - Thư giãn
Tài liệu phổ thông
Văn mẫu
Giới thiệu
Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
Tìm
Danh mục
Kinh doanh - Marketing
Kinh tế quản lý
Biểu mẫu - Văn bản
Tài chính - Ngân hàng
Công nghệ thông tin
Tiếng anh ngoại ngữ
Kĩ thuật công nghệ
Khoa học tự nhiên
Khoa học xã hội
Văn hóa nghệ thuật
Y tế sức khỏe
Văn bản luật
Nông lâm ngư
Kĩ năng mềm
Luận văn - Báo cáo
Giải trí - Thư giãn
Tài liệu phổ thông
Văn mẫu
Thông tin
Điều khoản sử dụng
Quy định bảo mật
Quy chế hoạt động
Chính sách bản quyền
Giới thiệu
Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
0
Trang chủ
Khoa Học Tự Nhiên
Môi trường
Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers
Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers
Ðức Phi
64
134
pdf
Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Engineered barriers to isolate potentially harmful waste from humans and ecosystems have been used for over 35 years, and much has been written about them and their constituent components. However, few reports have provided an overall assessment of the performance of engineered barrier systems. The last broad assessment was conducted in 1995 (Rumer and Mitchell, 1995). Since that time, new materials and sensor technologies have been introduced and models to predict contaminant transport have improved. At the request of program managers at the Environmental Protection Agency, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, National Science Foundation, and Department of Energy, the National Research Council established a committee to assess the effectiveness of surface and subsurface engineered barriers over. | ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ENGINEERED WASTE CONTAINMENT BARRIERS Committee to Ássess the Performance of Engineered Barriers Board on Earth Sciences and Resources Division on Earth and Life Studies NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington D.c. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street N.W. Washington DC 20001 NOTICE The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences the National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Science BER Grant No. DE-FG02-06ER64259 Environmental Protection Agency Grant No. CR-83211601 National Science Foundation Grant No. CMS-0243338 and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC Award No. NRC-04-02-081. Any opinions findings conclusions or recommendations contained in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees makes any warranty express or implied or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy completeness or usefulness of any information apparatus product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name trademark manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement recommendation or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. International Standard Book Number-13 978-0-309-10809-6 Book International Standard Book Number-10 0-309-10809-8 Book International Standard
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN
Handbook of Psychological Assessment (4th ed) - Gary Groth-Marnat
Cleaner Production Assessment in Dairy Processing
A guide to assessment in early childhood: Infancy to age eight
Paediatric functional skills information pack from pearson assessment
Age appropriate transition assessment toolkit
Best practices in academic assessment in higher education: A case in formative and shared assessment
An investigation into EFL teachers’ perceptions of in-class english speaking assessment
A review of theories and research into second language writing assessment criteria
What teachers think about assessment and how it influences their classroom-based assessment practices – The results of a global survey
The necessity of assessment for learning in building integrated language skills
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.