Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Báo cáo toán học: "From Recursions to Asymptotics"

Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu khoa học hay nhất của tạp chí toán học quốc tế đề tài: From Recursions to Asymptotics. | From Recursions to Asymptotics On Szekeres Formula for the Number of Partitions E. Rodney Canfield Department of Computer Science University of Georgia Athens gA 30602 UsA erc@cs.uga.edu For Herb Wilf on his 65-th Birthday Submitted August 1 1996 Accepted November 21 1996 Abstract. We give a new proof of Szekeres formula for P n k the number of partitions of the integer n having k or fewer positive parts. Our proof is based on the recursion satisfied by P n k and Taylor s formula. We make no use of the Cauchy integral formula or any complex variables. The derivation is presented as a step-by-step procedure to facilitate its application in other situations. As corollaries we obtain the main term of the Hardy-Ramanujan formulas for p n the number of unrestricted partitions of n and for q n the number of partitions of n into distinct parts. AMS-MOS Subject Classification 1990 . Primary 05A17 Secondary 05A20 05A16 11P81 THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS 4 no. 2 1997 R6 2 1 Introduction. A partition of an integer n into k parts is a solution to the system n X1 x2 Xk X1 x2 Xk 0. Let P n k be the number of partitions of n into k or fewer parts. We will prove the following. Theorem. Szekeres Let e 0 be given. Then uniformly for k n1 6 P n k f u exp I n1 2g u O n 1 6 eVl. n Here u k n1 2 and the functions f u g u are v f u 93 L Í1 - e v - 2u2e v 1 2 1-1 23 2 nu 2v z_ _ g u -ulog 1 -e 1-2 u where v v u is determined implicitly by u2 v2 Ị Ị 1 dt. 1.3 Remarks. The estimate can be made uniform for the entire range k 1 by adding 1 k to the big-oh term. The last equation uniquely determines v because the right hand side is an increasing function of v . Szekeres presents his results in two papers 12 13 using substantially different approaches for two distinct though slightly overlapping ranges of k . The papers are remarkable both for the depth of the analysis contained in them and for the precision of their results. Indeed Szekeres is the only known proof that p n k is .