tailieunhanh - Báo cáo khoa học: "STRUCTURAL NON-CORRESPONDENCE IN TRANSLATION"

Kaplan et al (1989) present an approach to machine translation based on co-description. In this paper we show that the notation is not as natural and expressive as it appears. We first show that the most natural analysis proposed in Kaplan et al (1989) cannot in fact cover the range of data for the important translational phenomenon in question. This contribution extends the work reported on in Sadler et al (1989) and Sadler et al (1990). We then go on to discuss alternatives which depart from or extend the formalism proposed in Kaplan et al (1989) in various. | STRUCTURAL NON-CORRESPONDENCE IN TRANSLATION Louisa Sadler Henry s. Thompson Dept of Language and Linguistics Human Communication Research Centre University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester CO4 3SQ Essex UK. louisa@ ABSTRACT Kaplan et al 1989 present an approach to machine translation based on co-description. In this paper we show that the notation is not as natural and expressive as it appears. We first show that the most natural analysis proposed in Kaplan et al 1989 cannot in fact cover the range of data for the important translational phenomenon in question. This contribution extends the work reported on in Sadler et al 1989 and Sadler et al 1990 . We then go on to discuss alternatives which depart from or extend the formalism proposed in Kaplan et al 1989 in various respects pointing out some directions for further research. The strategies discussed have been implemented. 0. Introduction Recent work in LFG uses the notion of projection to refer to linguistically relevant mappings or correspondences between levels whether these mappings are direct or involve function composition Halvoisen Kaplan 1988 Kaplan 1987 Kaplan et al 1989 . Mapping functions such as Ip from c to f structure and Ơ from c to semantic structure are familiar from the LFG literature. Kaplan et al 1989 extend this approach to Machine Translation by defining two translation functions T between f-structures and T between semantic structures . By means of these functions one can co-describe elements of source and target f-structures and s-structures respectively. Achieving translation can be thought of in terms of specifying and resolving a set of constraints on target structures constraints which are expressed by means of the T and t functions. The formalism permits a wide variety of source-target correspondences to be expressed T and can be composed as can T and Ơ. The approach allows for equations specifying translations to be added to lexical entries and source language .

• Báo cáo khoa học
• STRUCTURAL NON CORRESPONDENCE IN TRANSLATION
• Henry S
• Thompson
• Long Papers
• scientific reports
• model language
• process natural language
• Dialog Control
• Natural Language System
• Dialog Control in a Natural Language System
• Expanding the Horizons
• Natural Language Interfaces
• Phil Hayes
• PROSPECTS OR PRACTICAL
• NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS
• Workshops
• NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERACTION WITH MACHINES
• COMPUTER INTEBFACE DESIGN MURRAY TUROFF DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
• IiVFORMATION SCIENCE IIEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
• EVALUATION OF NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASE SYSTEMS
• A PANEL DISCUSSION
• database query system
• J
• Norwood Crout
• INTERFACES TO DATA BASE SYSTEMS
• Bozena Henisz
• INTERPRETING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• DATABASE UPDATES
• S
• Jermld Kaplan Jim David
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASES
• Gary G
• Hendrlx and William H
• Lewis
• DATABASES THEORETICAL
• TECHNICAL ISSUES
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE INTERFACES
• PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES
• Barbara J
• Grosz
• THEORETICAL TECHNICAL ISSUES
• NATURAL LANGUAGE ACCESS TO DATABASES
• R
• Petrick
• Domain Independent
• Database Access Systems
• ISSUES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
• ACCESS TO DATABASES
• A LOGIC PROGRAMMING PERSPECTIVE
• Sharon C
• Salveter David Maier
• PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• EXPRESSIONS REFERRING
• Douglas E
• Appelt
• THE TEXT SYSTEM
• NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION
• Kathleen R
• M
• MENTING A DATABASE
• KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
• THE KEY TO THE SELECTION PROBLEM
• E
• Jeffrey Conklin David D
• McDonald
• A KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING
• Stuart C
• Shapiro
• NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXTS
• NECESSARILY GRAMMATICAL
• EVEN COMPLETE
• UNGRAMHATICALITY
• EXTRA GRAMMATICALITY
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS
• Taxonomy
• Descriptions
• Individuals in Natural
• Language Understanding
• The Use of Ooject Special Knowledge
• Natural Language Processing
• Mark H
• Bursteln