tailieunhanh - Báo cáo khoa học: "The Relationship Between Tree Adjoining Grammars "

We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the two formalisms. We then turn to a discussion comparing the linguistic expressiveness of the two formalisms. | The Relationship Between Tree Adjoining Grammars And Head Grammars . Weir . Joshi Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 Abstract We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the two formalisms. We then turn to a discussion comparing the linguistic expressiveness of the two formalisms. 1 Introduction Recent work 9 3 has revealed a very close formal relationship between the grammatical formalisms of Tree Adjoining Grammars tag s and Head Grammars HG s . In this paper we examine whether they have the same power of linguistic description. TAG S were first introduced in 1975 by Joshi Levy and Takahashifl and investigated further in 2 4 8 . HG s were first introduced by Pollard 5 . tag s and HG s were introduced to capture certain structural properties of natural languages. These formalisms were developed independently and are notationally quite different tag s deal with a set of elementary trees composed by means of an operation called adjoining. HG s maintain the essential character of context-free string rewriting rules except for the fact that besides concatenation of strings string wrapping operations are permitted. Observations of similarities between properties of the two formalisms led US to study the formal relationship between these two formalisms and the results of this investigation are presented in detail in 9 3 . We will briefly describe the formal relationship established in 9 3 showing tag s to be equivalent to a variant of HG s. We argue that the relationship between HG s and this variant of HG s called Modified Head Grammars MHG s is very close. Having discussed the question of the weak equivalence of tag s and HG s we explore in Sections 4 and 5 what might be loosely described as their strong equivalence. Section 4 discusses consequences of the substantial .

• Báo cáo khoa học
• The Relationship Between Tree Adjoining Grammars
• D
• Weir K
• Vijay Shanker
• A
• Joshi
• scientific reports
• model language
• process natural language
• Dialog Control
• Natural Language System
• Dialog Control in a Natural Language System
• Expanding the Horizons
• Natural Language Interfaces
• Phil Hayes
• PROSPECTS OR PRACTICAL
• NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS
• Workshops
• NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERACTION WITH MACHINES
• Long Papers
• COMPUTER INTEBFACE DESIGN MURRAY TUROFF DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
• IiVFORMATION SCIENCE IIEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
• EVALUATION OF NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASE SYSTEMS
• A PANEL DISCUSSION
• database query system
• J
• Norwood Crout
• INTERFACES TO DATA BASE SYSTEMS
• Bozena Henisz
• INTERPRETING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• DATABASE UPDATES
• S
• Jermld Kaplan Jim David
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASES
• Gary G
• Hendrlx and William H
• Lewis
• DATABASES THEORETICAL
• TECHNICAL ISSUES
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE INTERFACES
• PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES
• Barbara J
• Grosz
• THEORETICAL TECHNICAL ISSUES
• NATURAL LANGUAGE ACCESS TO DATABASES
• R
• Petrick
• Domain Independent
• Database Access Systems
• ISSUES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
• ACCESS TO DATABASES
• A LOGIC PROGRAMMING PERSPECTIVE
• Sharon C
• Salveter David Maier
• PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• EXPRESSIONS REFERRING
• Douglas E
• Appelt
• THE TEXT SYSTEM
• NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION
• Kathleen R
• M
• MENTING A DATABASE
• KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
• THE KEY TO THE SELECTION PROBLEM
• E
• Jeffrey Conklin David D
• McDonald
• A KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING
• Stuart C
• Shapiro
• NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXTS
• NECESSARILY GRAMMATICAL
• EVEN COMPLETE
• UNGRAMHATICALITY
• EXTRA GRAMMATICALITY
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS
• Taxonomy
• Descriptions
• Individuals in Natural
• Language Understanding
• The Use of Ooject Special Knowledge
• Natural Language Processing
• Mark H
• Bursteln