tailieunhanh - Báo cáo khoa học: "AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION OF DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION STRUCTURES"

Kamp's Discourse Representation T h e o r y is a major breakthrough regarding the systematic translation of natural language discourse into logical form. W e have therefore chosen to m a r r y the User Specialty Languages System, which was originally designed as a natural language frontend to a relational database system, with this n e w theory. In the paper w e try to s h o w taking - for the sake of simplicity - Kemp's fragment of English h o w this is achieved. | AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION OF DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION STRUCTURES Franz Guenthner Universitãt Tubingen Wilhelmstr. 50 D-7400 Tubingen FRG Hubert Lehmann IBM Deutschland GmbH Heidelberg Scientific Center Tiergartenstr. 15 D-69OO Heidelberg FRG Abstract Kamp s Discourse Representation Theory is a major breakthrough regarding the systematic translation of natural language discourse into logical form. We have therefore chosen to marry the User Specialty Languages System which was originally designed as a natural language frontend to a relational database system with this new theory. In the paper we try to show taking - for the sake of simplicity - Kamp s fragment of English how this is achieved. The research reported is going on in the context of the project Linguistics and Logic Based Legal Expert System undertaken jointly by the IBM Heidelberg Scientific Center and the Universitat Tubingen. 1 Introduction In this paper we are concerned with the systematic translation of natural language discourse into Discourse Representation Structures as they are defined in Discourse Representation Theory DRT first formulated by Kamp 1981 . This theory represents a major breakthrough in that it systematically accounts for the context dependent interpretation of sentences in particular with regard to anaphoric relations. From a syntactic point of view however Kamp chose a very restricted fragment of English. It is our goal therefore to extend the syntactic coverage for DRT by linking it to the grammars described for the User Specialty Languages USL system Lehmann 1978 ott and Zoeppritz 1979 Lehmann 1980 Sopena 1982 Zoeppritz 1984 which are comprehensive enough to deal with realistic discourses. Our main tasks are then to describe - the syntactic framework chosen - Discourse Representation Structures DRSs - the translation from parse trees to DRSs The translation from parse trees to DRSs will as we shall see not proceed directly but rather via Intermediate Structures which were already .

• Báo cáo khoa học
• AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION
• DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION STRUCTURES
• Franz Guenthner
• scientific reports
• model language
• process natural language
• Polarity tagged Corpus
• HTML Documents
• báo cáo khoa học
• mô hình ngôn ngữ
• xử lý ngôn ngữ tự nhiên
• Frame Representations
• Spont aneous Speech in Unrestricted Domains
• hypernym labeled noun hierarchy from text
• Sharon A
• Caraballo
• Noun phrase co occurrence statistics
• semi automatic semantic
• lexicon construction
• Machine Translation Knowledge
• Translation Literalness
• BL Automatic Transmission
• System construction
• System layout
• Shift lock device installation
• Electrical control parts
• Hydarulic control system
• Electronic control
• Project schedule management
• Critical path method
• Time cost tradeoff analysis
• Differential evolution
• NET framework
• BMC Bioinformatics
• Flux balance analysis
• Escherichia coli
• Metabolic modeling
• Enzyme constraints
• Protein allocation
• Minimal cut sets
• Dialog Control
• Natural Language System
• Dialog Control in a Natural Language System
• Expanding the Horizons
• Natural Language Interfaces
• Phil Hayes
• PROSPECTS OR PRACTICAL
• NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS
• Workshops
• NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERACTION WITH MACHINES
• Long Papers
• COMPUTER INTEBFACE DESIGN MURRAY TUROFF DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
• IiVFORMATION SCIENCE IIEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
• EVALUATION OF NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASE SYSTEMS
• A PANEL DISCUSSION
• database query system
• J
• Norwood Crout
• INTERFACES TO DATA BASE SYSTEMS
• Bozena Henisz
• INTERPRETING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• DATABASE UPDATES
• S
• Jermld Kaplan Jim David
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASES
• Gary G
• Hendrlx and William H
• Lewis
• DATABASES THEORETICAL
• TECHNICAL ISSUES
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE INTERFACES
• PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES
• Barbara J
• Grosz
• THEORETICAL TECHNICAL ISSUES
• NATURAL LANGUAGE ACCESS TO DATABASES
• R
• Petrick
• Domain Independent
• Database Access Systems
• ISSUES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
• ACCESS TO DATABASES
• A LOGIC PROGRAMMING PERSPECTIVE
• Sharon C
• Salveter David Maier
• PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• EXPRESSIONS REFERRING
• Douglas E
• Appelt
• THE TEXT SYSTEM
• NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION
• Kathleen R
• M
• MENTING A DATABASE
• KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
• THE KEY TO THE SELECTION PROBLEM
• E
• Jeffrey Conklin David D
• McDonald
• A KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING
• Stuart C
• Shapiro
• NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXTS
• NECESSARILY GRAMMATICAL
• EVEN COMPLETE
• UNGRAMHATICALITY
• EXTRA GRAMMATICALITY
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS
• Taxonomy
• Descriptions
• Individuals in Natural
• Language Understanding
• The Use of Ooject Special Knowledge
• Natural Language Processing
• Mark H
• Bursteln