tailieunhanh - Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012

After program outcomes are defined in general terms, the next step is to translate the statements into specific indicators that will be measured. For each outcome, the working group needs to identify one or more outcome indicators that could be measured to track progress toward the outcomes. Key criteria are the feasibility and cost of measurement. Outcome indicators should almost always begin with words such as “The number of . . .” or “The percent of . . .” Exhibit 8 illustrates the relationship between a program’s mission/objectives, outcomes, and outcome indicators. Although data sources and collection procedures are discussed in step 7, the final selection of the specific outcome. | Special Articles Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock 2012 R. Phillip Dellinger MD1 Mitchell M. Levy MD2 Andrew Rhodes MB BS3 Djillali Annane MD4 Herwig Gerlach MD PhD5 Steven M. Opal MD6 Jonathan E. Sevransky MD7 Charles L. Sprung MD8 Ivor S. Douglas MD9 Roman Jaeschke MD10 Tiffany M. Osborn MD MPH11 Mark E. Nunnally MD12 Sean R. Townsend MD13 Konrad Reinhart MD14 Ruth M. Kleinpell PhD RN-CS15 Derek C. Angus MD MPH16 Clifford S. Deutschman MD MS17 Flavia R. Machado MD PhD18 Gordon D. Rubenfeld MD19 Steven A. Webb MB BS PhD20 Richard J. Beale MB BS21 Jean-Louis Vincent MD PhD22 Rui Moreno MD PhD23 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup Objective To provide an update to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock last published in 2008. Design A consensus committee of 68 international experts representing 30 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings for those committee members attending the conference . A formal conflict of interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independent of any industry funding. A stand-alone meeting was held for all subgroup heads co- and vice-chairs and selected individuals. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. 1 Cooper University Hospital Camden New Jersey. 2 Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island. 3 St. George s Hospital London United Kingdom. 4 Hôpital Raymond Poincaré Garches France. 5 Vivantes-Klinikum Neukolln Berlin Germany. 6 Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island Pawtucket Rhode Island. 7 Emory University Hospital Atlanta Georgia. 8 Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem Israel. 9 Denver .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.