tailieunhanh - Economic Crises, High Public Pension Spending and Blame-avoidance Strategies

Thus, the proper question for prevention—and, ultimately, for all of health care—is not whether it saves money but whether it offers good value on the dollar. strategy—prevention, a new diagnostic test, or a better treatment—offers the greatest benefit per unit cost? Finding the best ways to enhance health for the same cost is common sense, and it is common practice in other countries, such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Japan. The agencies that control health spending in these countries have made it a priority to study the CE of services and to eschew inefficient practices. . | MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FUR GESELLSCHAFTSFORSCHUNG MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES MPIfG Discussion Paper 10 9 Economic Crises High Public Pension Spending and Blame-avoidance Strategies Pension Policy Retrenchments in 14 Social-insurance Countries 1981-2005 Juan J. Fernandez MPIfG Discussion Paper Juan J. Fernandez Economic Crises High Public Pension Spending and Blame-avoidance Strategies Pension Policy Retrenchments in 14 Social-insurance Countries 1981-2005 MPIfG Discussion Paper 10 9 Max-Planck-Institut fur Gesellschaftsforschung Koln Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Cologne August 2010 MPIfG Discussion Paper ISSN 0944-2073 Print ISSN 1864-4325 Internet 2010 by the author s Juan J. Fernandez is a postdoctoral fellow at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Cologne. fernandez@ MPIfG Discussion Papers are refereed scholarly papers of the kind that are publishable in a peer-reviewed disciplinary journal. Their objective is to contribute to the cumulative improvement of theoretical knowledge. The papers can be ordered from the institute for a small fee hard copies or downloaded free of charge PDF . Downloads Go to Publications Discussion Papers Max-Planck-Institut fur Gesellschaftsforschung Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Paulstr. 3 50676 Cologne Germany Tel. 49 221 2767-0 Fax 49 221 2767-555 info@ Abstract This paper examines the determinants of the timing of public pension policy retrenchments in 14 affluent democracies. Available research does not satisfactorily capture the multidimensionality of these legislative events because it relies on indicators of pension policy provisions for current pensioners even though recent retrenchment pension reforms have been characterized by phased-in or grandfathering measures. Instead this paper identifies these events by considering the individual long-term implications of each pension reform passed in 14 OECD .

crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.