tailieunhanh - Thinking between disciplines: an aesthetics of knowledge

Similar effects may be quite common in everyday life: information which we are not aware of processing contributes to the tenor of our experience, and even to the nature of our activity, in the reciprocal relationship of doing and undergoing. I see no reason to deny that this may be an aesthetic phenomenon, since it seems that something similar may be true in an experience of art: even when we are attending quite carefully, the complexity of the experience may be such that some elements will fail to be consciously noticed, but will still contribute to the. | PARRHESIA NUMBER 1 2006 1 - 12 Thinking between disciplines an aesthetics of knowledge1 Jacques Rancière Translated by Jon Roffe What should be understood by the invocation of an aesthetics of knowledge It is clearly not a matter of saying that the forms of knowledge must take on an aesthetic dimension. The expression presupposes that such a dimension does not have to be added as a supplementary ornament that it is there in every sense as an immanent given of knowledge. It remains to be seen what this implies. The thesis that I would like to present is simple to speak of an aesthetic dimension of knowledge is to speak of a dimension of ignorance which divides the idea and the practise of knowledge themselves. This proposition evidently implies a presupposition concerning the meaning of aesthetics . The thesis is the following aesthetics is not the theory of the beautiful or of art nor is it the theory of sensibility. Aesthetics is an historically determined concept which designates a specific regime of visibility and intelligibility of art which is inscribed in a reconfiguration of the categories of sensible experience and its interpretation. It is the new type of experience that Kant systematised in the Critique of Judgement. For Kant aesthetic experience implies a certain disconnection from the habitual conditions of sensible experience. This is what he summarises as a double negation. The object of aesthetic apprehension is characterised as that which is neither an object of knowledge nor an object of desire. Aesthetic appreciation of a form is without concept. An artist does not give form to a given matter according to a function of knowledge savoir . The reasons of the beautiful are thus separate from those of art. They are also separate though from the reasons which render an object desirable or offensive. Now this double THINKING BETWEEN DISCIPLIINES negation is not only defined by the new conditions of appreciation of art works. It also defines a certain .

• Chụp ảnh - Quay phim
• Allergen Bioinformatics
• Recent Trends
• Family Based Studies
• Complex Disorders
• Bioinformatics Software
• Studies on Osteoporosis