tailieunhanh - Báo cáo y học: "Commentary – a Potato, potšto, proxy consent, permission – just don’t call the whole thing off"

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care cung cấp cho các bạn kiến thức về ngành y đề tài: Commentary – a Potato, potšto, proxy consent, permission – just don’t call the whole thing off. | Available online http content 9 2 123 Commentary Potato potato proxy consent permission - just don t call the whole thing off Randi Zlotnik Shaul Bioethicist Bioethics Department The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada and Lecturer Department of Paediatrics University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada Corresponding author Randi Zlotnik Shaul Published online 7 January 2005 Critical Care 2005 9 123-124 DOI cc3037 This article is online at http content 9 2 123 2005 BioMed Central Ltd Abstract Research involving critically ill persons highlights challenging questions surrounding third party authorization. The ethical and legal viability of research involving persons who do not have the capacity to consent to participation is not universally accepted and inconsistent standards are reflected in research ethics guidelines law and practice. In order to ensure that research participants who are considered incapable of consenting to research are appropriately protected and that minimal risk research on illnesses affecting those who are unable to consent is enabled clear and justifiable parameters must be created and where they are already established they must be made more transparent. Introduction Research involving critically ill patients highlights challenging questions surrounding third party authorization. Can a proxy decision maker consent to research on another s behalf Can a researcher enrol someone who is considered unable to consent when the research is not specifically in that person s best interests The ethical and legal viability of research involving persons who do not have the capacity to consent to participation is not universally accepted 1 and inconsistent standards are reflected in research ethics guidelines law and practice. Some argue that inconsistent parameters for proxy authorization may have a chilling effect on research involving incapable persons and may result in .