tailieunhanh - báo cáo khoa học: " Implementation science: a role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning?"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Implementation science: a role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning? | BioMed Central Implementation Science Debate Open Access Implementation science a role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning Ruth M Sladek Paddy A Phillips and Malcolm J Bond Address Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Email Ruth M Sladek - Paddy A Phillips - Malcolm J Bond - Corresponding author Published 25 May 2006 Received 09 January 2006 Implementation Science 2006 1 12 doi 1748-5908-1-12 Accepted 25 May 2006 This article is available from http content 1 1 12 2006 Sladek et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background A better theoretical base for understanding professional behaviour change is needed to support evidence-based changes in medical practice. Traditionally strategies to encourage changes in clinical practices have been guided empirically without explicit consideration of underlying theoretical rationales for such strategies. This paper considers a theoretical framework for reasoning from within psychology for identifying individual differences in cognitive processing between doctors that could moderate the decision to incorporate new evidence into their clinical decision-making. Discussion Parallel dual processing models of reasoning posit two cognitive modes of information processing that are in constant operation as humans reason. One mode has been described as experiential fast and heuristic the other as rational conscious and rule based. Within such models the uptake of new research evidence can be represented by the latter mode it is reflective explicit and intentional. On the other hand well practiced clinical judgments can be .