tailieunhanh - báo cáo hóa học:" Meaning in life in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a representative survey with the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE)"

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về hóa học được đăng trên tạp chí hóa học đề tài : Meaning in life in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a representative survey with the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE) | BioMed Central Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Research Meaning in life in the Federal Republic of Germany results of a representative survey with the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation SMiLE Martin J Fegg Mechtild Kramer Claudia Bausewein and Gian D Borasio Address Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine Ludwig-Maximilians-University Marchioninistrasse 15 81371 Munich Germany Email Martin J Fegg - martin@ Mechtild Kramer - Claudia Bausewein - Gian D Borasio - borasio@ Corresponding author Open Access Published 22 November 2007 Received 28 August 2007 IJ Z- z. r r rm I I Z I A-7-7 mr r m Accepted 22 November 2007 Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2007 5 59 doi 1477-7525-5-59 This article is available from http content 5 1 59 2007 Fegg et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract__ Background The construct meaning-in-life MiL has recently raised the interest of clinicians working in psycho-oncology and end-of-life care and has become a topic of scientific investigation. Difficulties regarding the measurement of MiL are related to the various theoretical and conceptual approaches and its inter-individual variability. Therefore the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation SMiLE an individualized instrument for the assessment of MiL was developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate MiL in a representative sample of the German population. Methods In the SMiLE the respondents first indicate a minimum of three and maximum of seven areas which provide meaning to their life before rating their