tailieunhanh - Satellite Communications Part 12

Tham khảo tài liệu 'satellite communications part 12', kỹ thuật - công nghệ, cơ khí - chế tạo máy phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Interference in Cellular Satellite Systems 321 spot beam shown at the center with the blue circle is replaced by 4 sub-beams. The C I is calculated at discrete distances from the center d and at angular positions a . The chart on the right shows the C I for the spot beams blue lines and sub-beams red lines for different d and a values. The x-axis shows the ratio of the distance from the center to the spot beam radius R. Fig. 26. C I performance comparison within the spot beam It is observed that partitioning the spot beam into sub-beams performs superior towards the spot beam edge because the carrier power in the sub-beam gets stronger. This is typically where the spot beam performs worst and a significant advantage for the sub-beam approach results. The main region where the spot beam seems to perform better is at the center of the beam as expected due to the high carrier power levels in the spot beam. In the regions near the beam center it is observed that the sub-beam approach performs worst where the spot beams have the best performance. As expected this is due to the high carrier power the spot beam has at the center. Typically the C I value at the beam center has a higher margin as the systems are designed for the edge gain and the degraded performance of the sub-beam at the center may not pose a problem. To mitigate the relatively poor performance at the center it would be possible to optimize the sub-beam antennas to perform better at the beam centers. If necessary a further step could be to modify the frequency allocation. However this could result in lower system capacity and should be attempted only if the antenna size and cost is the primary concern. Overall the findings suggest that the subbeam approach holds promise as its C I is mostly not degraded compared to the spot beam approach while its peak gain is lower and thus requires smaller antenna aperture. 4. Conclusion Co-channel beam interference in multi-beam satellite communications systems was .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.