tailieunhanh - Emotional versus logical 5

Tham khảo tài liệu 'emotional versus logical 5', ngoại ngữ, anh ngữ phổ thông phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | POSTTEST 10. The author makes his or her point by a. making an argument using chronological order. b. arguing the benefits of buying from the most to least important. c. comparing and contrasting leasing and buying. d. stating opinions. 11. This writer bases his or her argument primarily on a. facts derived from the author s personal observations. b. opinions that others have reported to the author. c. facts with logic and statistics supporting them. d. opinions derived from the author s personal observations. 12. In another version of this passage the first sentence of the third paragraph did not use the words shocked and appalled to describe the reaction of car leasers to how much money they must pay when the lease is over. Instead the sentence read Furthermore people who lease cars are usually unaware of how much they must pay when the lease is over. Why do you think the writer changed the sentence to include shocked and appalled a. Someone he or she interviewed for the story used these words. b. These words make the author sound smarter. c. These words have a positive connotation that help the author make his or her case. d. These words have a powerful negative connotation that add to the author s arguments about the downfalls of leasing. 13. From the context it can be determined that the word upmarket in the third paragraph means a. safer. b. bigger. c. expensive. d. dependable. 14. Why did the author choose the second-person point of view for this passage a. The second-person point of view puts readers into the action of the writing. b. The second-person point of view makes readers imagine themselves in the situation. c. The second-person point of view makes readers pay more attention. d. all of the above 15. When this author says that most people want to lease because they can then drive a more upmarket car he or she is a. making a generalization that requires evidence before it can be confirmed. b. making an obvious generalization that needs no evidence. c.