tailieunhanh - age of inflation continued exposes criminal monetary policies of us federal reserve phần 5

chủ sở hữu, ba mươi hay bốn mươi phần trăm suy giảm, mà là khá phổ biến trong một tai nạn bong bóng, không chỉ dấu hiện đầu tư của mình, nhưng cũng có thể gây ra thiệt hại, trừ khi bổ sung ông bỏ đi từ của mình nhà ở và do đó thay đổi các thiệt hại cho các tổ chức tài chính cấp khoản vay. Khi suy giảm nghiêm trọng và chủ sở hữu | Age of Inflation Continued also threaten to impede economic activity. Does the conscience of knowledgeable voters who pay heed to such political promises force them to choose the lesser evil or even withdraw from the political fray Surely they will not vote for candidates walking in the footsteps of Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt who severed many trade relations with other countries and doubled and even trebled income and business taxes but will they consent to cast their votes for candidates who are treading on the heels of Presidents Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford and Carter They conducted popular policies that led to chronic stagflation that is a medley of rampant inflation and painful stagnation. By 1980 double-digit inflation was reducing the economic substance of most Americans and economic stagnation was depressing their levels of living. Surely knowledgeable voters would not choose such candidates unless they feel compelled to opt for the lesser evil and thus prevent the greater evil. But is it ethical in accordance with the principles of right and good conduct to cast a vote for any evil Most moral philosophers would answer this question in the affirmative as long as the lesser evil serves to prevent the greater evil. To save a life I may lie and deceive a raving assassin who is searching for his victim. But does this moral principle apply to the world of politics This writer is inclined to deny its applicability because a vote for one evil does not lead to inactivity but rather to ever more evil social and economic policies spring from social and economic thought that may give rise to many consequences. If I approve of any labor legislation that interferes with actual market conditions I may invite ever more legislation and regulation. If I favor some health-care benefits for some people at the expense of other people I may not be able to object to further improvements. If I approve of any affirmative action that is government programs allocating jobs and .