tailieunhanh - JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND ON PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASPECTS OF THE REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE MOUNT EREBUS AIRCRAFT DISASTER

On 5 August 1981, for reasons then given, this Court ordered that these proceedings be removed as a whole from the High Court to this Court for hearing and determination. They are proceedings, brought by way of application for judicial review, in which certain parts of the report of the Royal Commission on the Mount Erebus aircraft disaster are attacked. In summary the applicants claim that these parts are contrary to law, in excess of jurisdiction and in breach of natural justice. .One of the reasons for ordering the removal was that it was important that the complaints be finally. | JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND ON PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASPECTS OF THE REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE MOUNT EREBUS AIRCRAFT DISASTER Table of Contents JUDGMENT OF COOKE RICHARDSON and SOMERS JJ. JUDGMENT OF WOODHOUSE P. AND McMULLIN J. DELIVERED BY WOODHOUSE P. . 95 81 In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand Between Air New Zealand Limited First Applicant and Morrison Ritchie Davis Second Applicant and Ian Harding Gemmell Third Applicant and Peter Thomas Mahon First Respondent and the AttorneyGeneral Fourth Respondent and New Zealand Airline Pilots Association Fifth Respondent and the Attorney-General Sixth Respondent. Coram Woodhouse P. Cooke J. Richardson J. McMullin J. Somers J. Hearing 5 6 7 8 9 and 12 October 1981. Counsel . Brown . and . McGrane for first and second applicants. . Williams and . Stevens for third applicant. . Barton and . Chambers for first respondent. . McGuire for fourth respondent Civil Aviation Division leave to withdraw. . MacAlister and . Davison for fifth respondent. . Baragwanath and . Harrison for sixth respondent. Judgment 22nd December 1981. JUDGMENT OF COOKE RICHARDSON and SOMERS JJ. On 5 August 1981 for reasons then given this Court ordered that these proceedings be removed as a whole from the High Court to this Court for hearing and determination. They are proceedings brought by way of application for judicial review in which certain parts of the report of the Royal Commission on the Mount Erebus aircraft disaster are attacked. In summary the applicants claim that these parts are contrary to law in excess of jurisdiction and in breach of natural justice. One of the reasons for ordering the removal was that it was important that the complaints be finally adjudicated on as soon as reasonably practicable. We had in mind that the magnitude of the disaster 257 lives were lost made it a national and indeed international tragedy so the early resolution of any .

TÀI LIỆU MỚI ĐĂNG
31    254    0    30-04-2024
34    213    1    30-04-2024
46    187    0    30-04-2024
37    158    0    30-04-2024
41    122    0    30-04-2024
24    110    0    30-04-2024
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.