tailieunhanh - SCIENCE AND THE GREATER EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INITIATIVE

This report is a product of the Panel to Review the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative—a panel organized by the National Research Council (NRC) in response to congressional concerns that the restoration of the greater Everglades ecosystem be supported by the best possible science. The Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative (CESI) has been the primary investment by the . Department of the Interior to provide scientific information to advise restoration decision-making and to guide its own land management responsibilities for South Florida ecosystem restoration. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that the CESI program investments represent only a small fraction of total South Florida restoration science funding | CIENCE H GREATER LvERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION i About this PDF file This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original line lengths word breaks heading styles and other typesetting-specific formatting however cannot be retained and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution. SCIENCE AND THE GREATER EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INITIATIVE Panel to Review the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative Water Science and Technology Board Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology Division on Earth and Life Studies NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington . ii About this PDF file This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original line lengths word breaks heading styles and other typesetting-specific formatting however cannot be retained and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution. THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street . Washington DC 20001 NOTICE The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences the National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this study was provided by the . Department of the Interior under .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN