tailieunhanh - apple samsung verdict

Tham khảo sách 'apple samsung verdict', kinh doanh - tiếp thị, quản trị kinh doanh phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Case5 11-cv-01846-LHK Document1890 Filed08 21 12 Pagel of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California APPLE INC. a California corporation 1 Plaintiff v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. a Korean corporation SAMSUNG Electronics AMERICA INC. a New York corporation SAMSUNG telecommunications AMERICA LLC a Delaware limited liability company Defendants. __ SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. _ a Korean corporation SAMSUNG Electronics AMERICA INC. a New York corporation SAMSUNG telecommunications AMERICA LLC a Delaware limited liability company Counterclaim-Plaintiffs v. APPLE INC. a California corporation Counterclaim-Defendant. Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK VERDICT FORM We the jury unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case. 1 Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK VERDICT FORM Case5 11-cv-01846-LHK Document1890 Filed08 21 12 Page2 of 20 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINDINGS ON APPLE S CLAIMS APPLE S UTILITY AND DESIGN PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG 1. For each of the following products has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. SEC Samsung Electronics America SEA and or Samsung Telecommunications America STA has infringed Claim 19 of the 381 Patent Please answer in each cell with a Y for yes for Apple or with an N for no for Samsung . Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out. Accused Samsung Product Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Captivate JX 1011 Continuum JX 1016 Droid Charge JX 1025 Epic 4G JX 1012 .