tailieunhanh - Báo cáo y học: ""Getting your message through": an editorial guide for meeting publication standards"

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học quốc tế cung cấp cho các bạn kiến thức về ngành y đề tài: "Getting your message through": an editorial guide for meeting publication standards | Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine BioMed Central Open Access Getting your message through an editorial guide for meeting publication standards Kjetil G Ringdal 1 2 3 Hans Morten Lossius1 4 and Kjetil Soreide4 5 Address Department of Research Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation Drobak Norway 2Division of Emergency Medicine Oslo University Hospital Ullevâl Oslo Norway 3Faculty of Medicine Faculty Division Ullevâl University Hospital University of Oslo Oslo Norway 4Department of Surgical Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway and 5Department of Surgery Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway Email Kjetil G Ringdal - Hans Morten Lossius - Kjetil Soreide - ksoreide@ Corresponding author Published 23 December 2009 Received 17 December 2009 __. r-T n__JC-mno na I lo mn VI I Accepted 23 December 2009 Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2009 17 66 doi l757-724l -17-66 This article is available from http content l7Zl 66 2009 Ringdal et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Getting your message through Getting your message through is the sine qua non of medical science. If you cannot make your peers understand your message then you are bound to have manuscripts rejected or to have difficulties getting your valuable research published read and perused. The challenge for the scientist clinician is to present readable papers of general interest for judgment by editors editorial board members and peer reviewers while soundly describing the methods in a way that is recognizable to any knowledgeable scientist. Furthermore the editors and