tailieunhanh - Báo cáo y học: " Submission policy, peer-review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest"

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học quốc tế cung cấp cho các bạn kiến thức về ngành y đề tài: Submission policy, peer-review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest | Soreide et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2010 18 56 http content 18 1 56 SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF emergency medicine EDITORIAL Open Access Submission policy peer-review and editorial board members interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest Kjetil S0reide1 2 Kjetil G Ringdal3 4 Hans Morten Lossius2 3 Editors of the Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine The Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine welcomes an ever-increasing number of submissions while maintaining an acceptance level well below half of all submitted manuscripts 1 meaning that the number and quality of submitted papers are increasing. As has been stated in the past 2 the editors endorse a number of guidelines in order to improve presentation and style as well as adherence to current standards in publishing. Notably all papers submitted to the SJTREM and potentially deemed suitable for publication will undergo peer-review from at least 2 and often more referees before making a final decision to accept or reject. Due to an increasing number of case reports the decision to immediately reject those deemed unsuitable for the SJTREM has become more rigorous. The SJTREM wishes to maintain a main focus on original articles review articles and solicited commentaries to selected studies. While peer-review is currently the best yet however an imperfect controversial and sometimes a misused tool for vesting the scholarly work performed by others 3-5 the editors maintain their right to finally decide whether or not a paper should be published in the SJTREM. Indeed to paraphrase the recent Lancet editorial by Richard Horton 6 .peer review is indispensable .but we also know that it is widely misunderstood. Peer review is not the absolute or final arbiter of scientific does not test the validity of a piece of research. It does not guarantee truth. Peer review can improve the quality of a .

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.