tailieunhanh - Expert Systems and Geographical Information Systems for Impact Assessment - Chapter 11

Trong một nghiên cứu đánh giá tác động, sau khi các lĩnh vực khác nhau của tác động được nghiên cứu, tất cả các "chủ đề" được tham gia một lần nữa để đi đến một đánh giá tổng thể, và toàn bộ các cuộc thảo luận phải được trình bày trong một báo cáo có chứa các điểm chính của tất cả các lĩnh vực bảo hiểm, theo hướng dẫn cụ thể. Các báo cáo như một toàn thể cũng là chủ đề của giám sát như là một phần của quá trình điều khiển, và điều này được. | 11 Reviewing environmental impact statements META-ASSESSMENT REVIEWING ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS In an impact assessment study after the various areas of impact are studied all the threads are joined again to arrive at an overall assessment and the whole discussion must be presented in a report containing the main points of all the areas covered following specific guidelines. The report as a whole is also the subject of scrutiny as part of the control process and this is discussed in this chapter. The review of environmental statements is really a completely different stage in the process and requires also a completely different approach which we can use now to finish our discussion on different types of expert systems for impact assessment. Reviewing impact-assessment reports can be labelled meta-IA as it involves assessing the assessments of impacts. Advice on how to prepare Environmental Statements has been forthcoming from the Department of the Environment DoE 1995 and the reverse task of assessing the quality of such statements has also been progressively explored in increasing depth and detail. Early attempts by Lee and Colley 1990 and by the Commission of the European Communities CEC 1993 were followed by the first good-practice guide from the Department of the Environment DoE 1994 culminating in the definitive report DoE 1996 - which we shall take here as our main source - based on research at Oxford Brookes University on the changing quality of Environmental Statements Glasson etal. 1997 . Weston 2000 has also reviewed this question under the light of the new 1999 legislation but without developing the methodology any further. The task of reviewing impact-assessment reports can be summarised as assessing the completeness and presentation of such reports. It does not involve assessing the project impacts or the acceptability of the project - that will be for the development control procedures to determine - but assessing the impact report as a public .