tailieunhanh - The Oxford Companion to Philosophy Part 85

The Oxford Companion to Philosophy Part 85. The book is alphabetized by the whole headings of entries, as distinct from the first word of a heading. Hence, for example, abandonment comes before a priori and a posteriori. It is wise to look elsewhere if something seems to be missing. At the end of the book there is also a useful appendix on Logical Symbols as well as the appendices A Chronological Table of Philosophy and Maps of Philosophy. | 820 rights the rights are effective this protection is provided as something that is owed to persons for their own sakes. The upholding of rights is thus essential for human dignity. Although Wesley N. Hohfeld distinguished four different meanings of a right claims liberties powers and immunities claim-rights are the most important kind of rights because they entail correlative necessary duties to forbear from interfering with persons having the objects of their rights or in some situations to help persons to have these objects. The general structure of a claim-right is given by this formula A has a right to X against B by virtue of Y. There are five main elements here first the subject A of the right the right-holder second the nature of the right third the object X of the right fourth the respondent B of the right the duty-bearer fifth the justifying ground Y of the right. Two problems about redundancy are answered by reference to this formula. First although rights are correlative with duties rights are not redundant because their objects are benefits to the right-holder while duties are burdens of the respondent. Second rights cannot be dispensed with in favour of benefits or interests because having a right adds that there is strongjustification for being protected in one s benefit or interest such that the rightholder is personally entitled to have the benefit as his due and for his own sake as against utilitarian justifications . The benefit theory of the nature of rights emphasizes the relation between the subject and the object of rights to have a right is to be the directly intended beneficiary of someone else s performance of a good-providing duty. The choice theory emphasizes the relation between the subject and the respondent to have a right is to be in a justified position to determine by one s choice how other persons shall act. There are arguments for and against each theory the most acceptable account involves some combination of the two theories.

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.