tailieunhanh - How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper?
There have been many efforts reported in the literature to score or rate the quality of concept maps. In many cases the objective was to standardize procedures for grading student concept maps, but other efforts have served a variety of purposes, including guiding workshop participants to construct better concept maps or monitoring the advances in concept mapping techniques on a large population of users. We examine some of the criteria used by others for rating or scoring concept maps as “good” and propose a scheme that takes into account both graphical structure criteria and semantic or subject matter accuracy that we propose can lead to better, “excellent” concept maps. It has been said that presentations that are concise but capture the complexity of the content involved are elegant—and producing these kinds of concept maps should be our goal. | Knowledge Management E-Learning Vol. 7 . Mar 2015 Knowledge Management E-Learning ISSN 2073-7904 How good is my concept map Am I a good Cmapper Alberto J. Canas Institute for Human Machine Cognition IHMC USA Joseph D. Novak Institute for Human Machine Cognition IHMC USA Cornell University USA Priit Reiska Tallinn University Estonia Recommended citation Canas A. J. Novak J. D. Reiska P. 2015 . How good is my concept map Am I a good Cmapper Knowledge Management E-Learning 7 1 6-19. Knowledge Management E-Learning 7 1 6-19 How good is my concept map Am I a good Cmapper Alberto J. Canas Institute for Human Machine Cognition IHMC USA E-mail acanas@ Joseph D. Novak Institute for Human Machine Cognition IHMC USA Cornell University USA E-mail jnovak@ Priit Reiska Institute of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Tallinn University Estonia E-mail Corresponding author Abstract There have been many efforts reported in the literature to score or rate the quality of concept maps. In many cases the objective was to standardize procedures for grading student concept maps but other efforts have served a variety of purposes including guiding workshop participants to construct better concept maps or monitoring the advances in concept mapping techniques on a large population of users. We examine some of the criteria used by others for rating or scoring concept maps as good and propose a scheme that takes into account both graphical structure criteria and semantic or subject matter accuracy that we propose can lead to better excellent concept maps. It has been said that presentations that are concise but capture the complexity of the content involved are elegant and producing these kinds of concept maps should be our goal. Keywords Concept map Good concept map Scoring Assessment Criteria Rubric Excellent concept map Biographical notes Alberto J. Canas is Co-Founder and Associate Director of the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition - IHMC. .
đang nạp các trang xem trước