Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Modern Grammars of Case anderson phần 6

Tham khảo tài liệu 'modern grammars of case anderson phần 6', ngoại ngữ, ngữ pháp tiếng anh phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | 210 Modern Grammars of Case English when the argument is non-pronominal. Instead we have the positional redundancies in 67 67 a. English nominative F erg I D D b. English locative F loc adjunct I D D 67a looks identical to 64 for Latin. But with nouns in English there is no corresponding case like that specified in 64 we have a positional subject and a morphosyntactic one rather than one marked by nominal inflection. The position and morphosyntax associated with 67a is specified roughly in 68 a more precise account awaits the development of a more explicit syntax in the chapters that follow 68 a. English pre- T position F erg b. English agreement licensing F erg Normally these coincide but in 7.8 for example they do not recall 7.2 and see e.g. Anderson 1992 100-01 7.8 a. There is a Xy in my soup b. There are Xies in my soup Here the positional subject is distinct from the agreement licenser. Again we must await the development of other aspects before we can account for the apparent presence in 7.8 of two F erg elements. There is a Latin analogue to 68b but not obviously to 68a . 67b is limited without an accompanying preposition to circumstantials and to certain classes of arguments among these such as are illustrated in 65 . In this case the semantic relations involved are signalled primarily by the adjunct s lexical content. And if a preposition governs a D there is with English nominals other than pronouns no absorbed semantic relation such as is allowed for by 64 with non-pronominals analytic and absorbed functor are incompatible. The D simply satisfies the requirements of the prepositional functor and its position is determined by it and some other regularities as we shall see in Part III . There are thus no cases for English nominals like those The Category of Case 211 defined for Latin in 62 and 64 . For pronouns we need the equivalent of 64 69 English nominative pronoun F src But again this does not capture all aspects of the distribution of the nominative