Kinh doanh - Marketing
Kinh tế quản lý
Biểu mẫu - Văn bản
Tài chính - Ngân hàng
Công nghệ thông tin
Tiếng anh ngoại ngữ
Kĩ thuật công nghệ
Khoa học tự nhiên
Khoa học xã hội
Văn hóa nghệ thuật
Sức khỏe - Y tế
Văn bản luật
Nông Lâm Ngư
Kỹ năng mềm
Luận văn - Báo cáo
Giải trí - Thư giãn
Tài liệu phổ thông
Văn mẫu
Giới thiệu
Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
Tìm
Danh mục
Kinh doanh - Marketing
Kinh tế quản lý
Biểu mẫu - Văn bản
Tài chính - Ngân hàng
Công nghệ thông tin
Tiếng anh ngoại ngữ
Kĩ thuật công nghệ
Khoa học tự nhiên
Khoa học xã hội
Văn hóa nghệ thuật
Y tế sức khỏe
Văn bản luật
Nông lâm ngư
Kĩ năng mềm
Luận văn - Báo cáo
Giải trí - Thư giãn
Tài liệu phổ thông
Văn mẫu
Thông tin
Điều khoản sử dụng
Quy định bảo mật
Quy chế hoạt động
Chính sách bản quyền
Giới thiệu
Đăng ký
Đăng nhập
0
Trang chủ
Giải Trí - Thư Giãn
Du lịch
JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND ON PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASPECTS OF THE REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE MOUNT EREBUS AIRCRAFT DISASTER
Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND ON PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASPECTS OF THE REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE MOUNT EREBUS AIRCRAFT DISASTER
Quỳnh Dung
100
87
pdf
Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
On 5 August 1981, for reasons then given, this Court ordered that these proceedings be removed as a whole from the High Court to this Court for hearing and determination. They are proceedings, brought by way of application for judicial review, in which certain parts of the report of the Royal Commission on the Mount Erebus aircraft disaster are attacked. In summary the applicants claim that these parts are contrary to law, in excess of jurisdiction and in breach of natural justice. .One of the reasons for ordering the removal was that it was important that the complaints be finally. | JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND ON PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW ASPECTS OF THE REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE MOUNT EREBUS AIRCRAFT DISASTER Table of Contents JUDGMENT OF COOKE RICHARDSON and SOMERS JJ. JUDGMENT OF WOODHOUSE P. AND McMULLIN J. DELIVERED BY WOODHOUSE P. C.A. 95 81 In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand Between Air New Zealand Limited First Applicant and Morrison Ritchie Davis Second Applicant and Ian Harding Gemmell Third Applicant and Peter Thomas Mahon First Respondent and the AttorneyGeneral Fourth Respondent and New Zealand Airline Pilots Association Fifth Respondent and the Attorney-General Sixth Respondent. Coram Woodhouse P. Cooke J. Richardson J. McMullin J. Somers J. Hearing 5 6 7 8 9 and 12 October 1981. Counsel L.W. Brown Q.C. and R.J. McGrane for first and second applicants. D.A.R. Williams and L.L. Stevens for third applicant. G.P. Barton and R.S. Chambers for first respondent. C.J. McGuire for fourth respondent Civil Aviation Division leave to withdraw. A.F. MacAlister and P.J. Davison for fifth respondent. W.D. Baragwanath and G.M. Harrison for sixth respondent. Judgment 22nd December 1981. JUDGMENT OF COOKE RICHARDSON and SOMERS JJ. On 5 August 1981 for reasons then given this Court ordered that these proceedings be removed as a whole from the High Court to this Court for hearing and determination. They are proceedings brought by way of application for judicial review in which certain parts of the report of the Royal Commission on the Mount Erebus aircraft disaster are attacked. In summary the applicants claim that these parts are contrary to law in excess of jurisdiction and in breach of natural justice. One of the reasons for ordering the removal was that it was important that the complaints be finally adjudicated on as soon as reasonably practicable. We had in mind that the magnitude of the disaster 257 lives were lost made it a national and indeed international tragedy so the early resolution of any .
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN
Qualitative Controlled Feedback For Forming Group Judgments And Making Decisions
Báo cáo khoa học: "Evaluation of Machine Translations by Reading Comprehension Tests and Subjective Judgments"
A framework of a computerized decision aid to improve group judgments
Policy on the implementation of the law on execution of criminal judgments - some the oretical issues
Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments
Decision Analysis for Management Judgment Third Edition
E THICAL R EASONING IN THE M ENTAL H EALTH P ROFESSIONS
Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions
Law and Philosophy Library VOLUME 8
An Ethical Problem
crossorigin="anonymous">
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.